Subscribe to our Blog

Your email:

Leadership Intelligence Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Employees that Quit and Stay

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn |  Share On Technorati Technorati | Submit to Reddit reddit 

A DecisionWise study of over 4,000 employees reveals that 14-15 % feel uneasy about the state of their organization and the economy, which translates into a loss of interest in one's job and looking outside the organization for other opportunities.

In the past, these employees would search for greener pastures and would leave the organization. Today, however, unemployment figures and general reductions in hiring have forced these individuals to stay with their current employer.

The 15% of employees who would be looking for other opportunities in a healthy economy end up quitting their job while staying on the job. They quit pscyhologically. When this occurs, they lose the drive, motivation, and engagement to do their work effectively. They waste their time, and ultimately, the organization's investment in their postion.  

Here are two solutions to minimize the impact of those that quit and stay and increase employee engagement:

1.  Identify who they are:  Through formal and informal feedback an organization can assess which employees are actively engaged in their jobs. Feedback tools, such as employee engagement surveys, should be constructed to generate honest feedback from employees while minimizing the risks of individual identification. An engagement profile helps organizations identify the percentage of employees quitting and staying along with what is driving the situation.

2.  Find out what makes them tick (and ticked off): Simply understanding the percentage of engaged vs. disengaged employees is not enough to facilitate change in an organization. Analyzing percieved levels of engagement and perceptions about job climate clarifies which factors enage people and which inhibit engagement on an organizational level. The key is to understand the motivations and the drivers, not just the percentage of disengaged employees.

As the economy changes in 2010, so will the employee experience. It will be critical to create valid profiles of engaged and disengaged employees unique to the organization to retain talented employees as job opportunities increase this year. Leveraging engagement profiles and employee opinions will generate change in the right people, change that is cost effective, and change with a significant return on investment. 

Understanding employee engagement in 2010 will catalyze changes that curb the quit and stay mentality.

View the recorded webinar:

After the Storm: Forecasting the 2010 Employee Engagement Climate.

Comments

Economic climate will not change this year. The worst is still to come, the real depression hasn't even begun. It will probably last for decade or more. 
 
 
 
I don't know how the employee engagement problem should be solved, and I don't care either. I know, however, what employee engaging methods will be used in the foreseeable future: The disengaged employees will be tracked down, and fired. 
 
 
 
So, boys and girls, if you want to keep your job, wear a happy face, and, above all, be very careful around theese "employee engagement surverys". They are not anonymous. Never were, never will be. 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:57 by mataj
Right Management found the same in a survey of North American workers who, when asked “Do you plan to pursue new job opportunities as the economy improves in 2010?” answered: 
• 60% - Yes, I intend to leave 
• 21% - Maybe, so I’m networking 
• 6% - Not likely, but I’ve updated my resume 
• 13% - No, I intend to stay 
 
That’s 87% actively engaging in activity to leave your organization. Take a look around your company today. Which employees do you think are the 13% most likely to stay? I guarantee it’s not your top performers. Various studies on employee engagement so it is the most disengaged that stay in their current role. 
 
Look at it another way: that's 87% of employees distracted by thoughts, daydreams or plans to leave your organization; 87% not fully focused on the task at hand, not fully engaged in helping you achieve your strategic objectives. 
 
More on this and what you can do about the coming "resume tsunami" here: http://globoforce.blogspot.com/2009/12/resume-tsunami-coming-are-you-ready.html
Posted @ Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:17 PM by Derek Irvine, Globoforce
Thanks for the comments from the employee point of view. 
 
While I agree that one approach to "dealing" with people that quit and stay is termination; most of our clients view this as a secondary measure to actually getting this group engaged. 
 
In addition, the clear majority of organizations that conduct a survey operate under strict guidelines to protect employee confidentiality. Typically, this involves only reporting groups (i.e. quit and stay group)that have 5 participants or more with no identifying information. 
 
The results from an engagement survey can effectively show the organization: 
 
1: What % are engaged, disengaged, and ready to leave. 
2: What can be done to increase engagement across each of these groups. 
 
The bottom line is that a survey that is tailored to the organization, received with an open mind, and acted upon is a benefit to every employee.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:50 PM by Paul Warner
Engagement is only the tip of the iceberg. If I were an employer I'd be concerned about organizational trust and credibility. 
Let's not forget that the baby boomers will be exiting the job market during the next few years, they are 75M strong compared to the 45M GenX group that is right behind.  
Jobs as we know them today will continue to disappear, they are a bi-product of the Industrial Revolution, work however, will continue to be available. The difference is that work will be available to those who can solve organizational issues, once solved the work is complete. 
Organizations will begin to realize that the cost of outsourcing is far less expensive than maintaining a workforce with benefits, whose cost continues to become an organizational nightmare. 
The other change that I predict is a reduction in overhead by implementing the use of technology which continues to become a less expensive alternative.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:53 PM by John Pprich
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Complimentary Webinar

The Buried Treasure in Your Employee Engagement Survey 
treasure chest small

 Register Now

Tuesday, Sept. 14th
2-3 pm Eastern Time

Sample 360 Degree Feedback Survey

360 Degree Feedback Survey

Sample Employee Engagement Survey